Social Profile Advertising: The Uncharted Frontier

by Efrat Varga August 12 , 2010 11:27
It’s certainly an exciting time these days for advertising. With new technologies being rolled out like fast food, advertising might be in line for a new golden age, where demand and venue options actually exceed supply. This skewed balance of supply and demand is not due to a lack of ad agencies, believe me, there are plenty – but rather because new technologies and ad mediums are popping up ever so quickly. This creates two major challenges for the ad industry:

First- Technologies are diversifying in so many different directions, and so quickly, one advertiser might specialize in post click optimization for mobile, while another might specialize in social gamming. Both industries are too new and are growing too fast for one company to have been able to specialize in both at this early stage.   

Second- There are no industry standards yet as to best practices for many of these mediums. It’s like the Wild West out there, with new methods and approaches being attempted all the time, and in many cases, advertisers are still learning as they go.

One such example of advertising’s many new mediums is social media. Social media is only a few years old but has exploded in popularity with hundreds of millions of users world-wide, and that number is growing exponentially. What throws most advertisers off is that there are really two sides to social media advertising. One side deals with the classic form of advertising, i.e. banners, visuals and copy. The thumbnail sized ad pictures on Facebook and the 140 character limit on Twitter are nothing new for advertisers. Creative minds have always been plagued with the challenge of reigning in their imaginations to fit the dimensions of paid for real-estate, chromatic boilerplates and character limitations. But then there’s the other side of social media advertising which many brands are still not aware that they are even involved in.  

Social media users of today are not the old media sponges that sat passively by as they absorbed a carefully crafted message built from weeks of collaborative efforts from creative professionals. These media targets are interactive, participating in a dialogue not only with the brand itself, but also with their own network about the brand, playing an active role, if not the main role, in painting a brand’s image in the eyes of the market. Many brands have made the mistake of ignoring the buzz that reverberates across the walls of the socialscape, not realizing how much it affects them until it is too late. 

Last year’s infamous incident of United Airlines ignoring the complaints of a disgruntled passenger who had his guitar broken by luggage handlers, made headlines and caused a whole lot of headache for the airlines corporate arm. It wasn’t the headlines though that caused all the trouble, but rather the passenger’s use of social media. The passenger, Dave Carroll, also happened to be a country singer, and he informed the intransigent customer service rep that he was going to make a YouTube music video highlighting his customer service, and that’s exactly what he did. What even Carroll didn’t expect was for the video to go viral overnight and actually cause United’s stock to drop dramatically costing United shareholders upwards of $180 million dollars. The company backtracked fairly quickly after that, offering to pay for all the damage, although the damage to United’s reputation and dollar value had already been done. Pretty powerful for one man with nothing but a video camera and a social profile at his disposal.   

And it’s not just the unknown power of social media that brands and advertisers have to be aware of, but the still forming social language and etiquette that can make the difference between a diehard fan base and a vengeful one. For example, advertisers and brands have to get used to the unwritten rule that brands should not be promoting themselves directly through their social profiles. If every other tweet by a given brand is about how great they are, not only do people not listen, they begin to resent the brand and label it as a spammer (one of the gravest insults one can be given in social media land). Instead, brands have to accustom themselves to providing their network with worthwhile media, either as information or entertainment, which does not necessarily have to have anything to do with the actual brand itself. In fact, it often shouldn’t. By not self promoting, brands come off as more genuine and can manage to convince their network that they are a viable social network friend. The thing about friends is that they trust each other, and help each other out. So the next time a prospective customer is looking for accurate news, why not choose the network they feel personally friendly with.

We can see from here that social media advertising is somewhat counter intuitive and its rules are still being ironed out. This post was not meant to offer solutions as much as it was to highlight the dynamic times and challenges that modern day advertising is facing, and to get advertisers to begin to think differently about how they plan on reaching their target market. The important thing for advertisers r to do right now, is to keep their finger on the pulse of the industry, and try to anticipate a trend shift where they can be a first mover in specializing in that area. The shifts should be plenty and not hard to find. Catching them before they happen as opposed to after, now that’s the hard part. Welcome to the frontier.        

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , , ,

Integrated Result-based approach

The Comeback Kid of Digital Advertising

by Efrat Varga August 4 , 2010 11:23
In the early days of the internet, it was thought that a revolution had taken place in the advertising world, and banner ads and click through campaigns were all the hype of the day. There is no question that a revolution had taken place however, with the popping of the internet bubble in the mid 2000’s, all things internet related took a major hit, and investors became rigorously analytical with every penny invested in digital business ventures. In hindsight, the microscopic scrutiny of the post bubble era may have been taken too far given that anyone using the internet at the time could have told you digital display ads, like banners and pop-ups, were uninteresting, often intrusive and rarely relevant to consumer habits. Reacting to the negative feedback of the first banner wave, media buyers gave display ads a back seat while they fell back on traditional advertising models and searched for new methods of exploiting the potential that online held for the next generation of advertising campaigns. Their search efforts eventually paid off in the form of… well, Search. Today, search based advertising comprises the majority of dollars earmarked for ad budgets with an estimated 11 billion dollars having been invested in 2009 alone.

Although we are singling out banner ads as an online industry whose initial primitive business structure caused it to absorb punishment from the backlash of the bubble burst, the truth is, every element of the internet was experiencing growing pains at the time as they learned that a web address was simply no replacement for sound business strategy. Remember how for months after the bubble burst, internet pundits claimed that online businesses were not viable entities on their own, and had to be paired with brick & mortar elements if they wished to have a chance at making their business model work. Well, when was the last time you heard the term “Brick & Mortar”, and today, everyone agrees that strictly online businesses have found their market and worked out the kinks of online business strategy.

The same can be said for banner ads. Lately, digital advertisers have been turning to technology to find solutions for turning display advertising into a targeted and statistically based science, increasing returns at a decreased cost, i.e. the original vision of the display ad industry. It seems that technology has finally caught up with vision, and advertisers are beginning to relinquish their outdated hesitation toward display ads as the efficiency and cost effectiveness of their results become increasingly more difficult to ignore. According to recent research estimates, display advertising can now be expected to grow by 17% per year!

Does this mean that display advertising will replace search? Probably not, as search has proven to be an effective advertising tool as well. What is does mean is that digital advertising campaigns will begin to become more multi pronged, in a similar fashion to their old media predecessors. Where old media would use television, radio and print to disseminate a consistent message across multiple channels, digital media will begin to follow a similar path, using search, display ads and things like digital email brochures, each vertical offering a separate advantage over the other. 

Search will always have the advantage that a prospective customer is currently searching for a solution, be it product, service or information oriented, and if an ad can be positioned to meet that solution, in part or in whole- that is a strong attractive advantage to offer advertisers. Display advertising has a separate advantage by way of creativity. First impressions given off by search ads are textual based and highly limited in their word count. Display ads are rich in the copy and in the visual department, allowing them far more creative freedom with which to capture the attention of a prospective client, while providing the potential means with which to take a campaign viral. 

Given the creative advantage that display ads offer, and combining it with the latest technology which allows for as targeted a campaign as search can offer, if not more so; display advertising is not only making a comeback as a viable ad venue choice next to search, we soon might be seeing display advertising overtaking search as the core element of multifaceted digital campaigns.           

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , ,

Display Ad

Optimization is never-ending

by Peles July 22 , 2010 05:53

The optimization of an organization’s varied processes enhances its lifespan and ability to survive - especially during harsh times such as the recession we are still recovering from. In fact, it's hard to think of any organizational process that would not benefit from optimization: from saving money on office supplies to maximizing the efficiency of internal systems. 

In the digital advertising world, optimization is being used to improve processes, to enhance the effectiveness of online-advertising campaigns and to increase the margin between the benefit of the campaign and its cost. In most cases the goal is finding a balance between this margin and the quantity (volume) achieved. More often than not the cost is calculated as the price of (effectively) obtaining a client, whereas the benefit is calculated as the income obtained from the same client (net, after selling costs).   

For the most part the goal is maximizing results. This means finding a balance between the desired margin and the volume achieved. It is usually the case, at least in online advertising, that we are willing to give up on some of the return in exchange for a greater volume. As an advertiser, we are willing to pay more to obtain a client if it results in us ultimately converting more customers. A volume discount does not usually work in our industry.

When managing a digital campaign, in order to get results, you must manage the process. Here, as mentioned before, in order to achieve a balance between a satisfactory margin and the desired volume, one has to manage the value chain of the campaign, with the understanding that each component in the chain not only influences the final outcome but also has an effect on every other link in the chain. For example, a creative concept with a high click-through rate will usually lead to a lower conversion rate.  The value chain is combined of and has effect as follows:

·         Promotional offer - directly affects the ability to convert customers while inversely impacting on their value.

·         Creative concept - directly affects the click-through rate while inversely impacting on the conversion rate. 

·         Media - directly affects the click-through rate while inversely impacting on the conversion rate. 

·         Landing - directly influences the conversion rate while inversely impacting on the value of the customers. 

Optimizing the whole value chain requires finding the correct combination of the different components so as to bring about the desired results.

The idea is to try different ingredients and different combinations (multivariate testing).
This means trying different marketing proposals, supported by an alternative creative concept, diverse media, appropriate landing pages and varied conversion funnels. 

The optimization process never ends, there are countless possibilities and always a better path to take, and its goals can and should change relative to the goals of the  business and the desire to achieve the initial objectives of the campaign.

Such optimization cannot be done without appropriate technology but technology alone is not enough. Skilled teams are required by both the advertiser and the media company. Both must be willing to work hard together to achieve the campaign goals - work which includes amongst other factors both parties sharing information in a transparent manner.

Be the first to rate this post

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , , ,

Value Chain

Optimization: The Cost of Benefit

by Efrat Varga July 12 , 2010 03:01

Optimization has been a popular word in business since the hi-tech age hit in the early 90’s. However, as technology became more complex, so did the practical meaning of that word. It just became something that people would use in marketing copy or during a presentation to impress some big wigs in suits.

Optimize, optimize, optimize.

What exactly do you mean by optimize?

Because if by optimization you mean taking a business process that has already been digitized, and breaking it down even further with more specialized technology, what you’re really getting is an un-optimized complex jumble of highly specialized processes.

Knowing this, when businesses pitch optimization, what they usually mean these days is simplification, i.e. which of the complex business process offering will a) cost me the least for b) the greatest return on investment.

Sounds pretty simple doesn’t it?

The problem is that simplification by itself is not optimization, and neither is ignoring the potential benefits of complexity simply because it’s, well…complex.

True optimization means finding a way to aggregate every element of complexity through a simplification filter that still allows for the exploitation of each and every element of the business process in a case specific adjustable fashion.

In the short run this will most probably require more initial investment, time (initial setup), money (initial investment), or otherwise – But in the long run, if you did your homework, your job will become far easier and the return, far greater.

Now let’s apply what we just said to digital advertising:

Generally speaking the average digital advertiser tries to spend the least amount of money per customer conversion, in an amount to “optimize” his specific conversion revenue. However, based on what we said, there has got to be a better way to go about this.

If we can only find a way to take all major aspects of a digital advertising campaign, each one affecting a different element of the conversion process:

·         Bid marketing- directly affects conversion percentage, indirectly affects customer value.

·         Creative concept- directly affects click through rate, indirectly affects conversion percentage.

·          Media- directly affects conversion, indirectly affects click through rate.

·         Landing page- directly affects conversion percentage, indirectly affects customer value.

And find a way to balance their weighted use properly throughout a campaign to affect the greatest overall conversion rate…Well now we’d be optimizing.

CTR Is Only One Part Of The Value Chain

by Efrat Varga July 1 , 2010 09:18
This article below appeared in Advertising Age last week. In it, Eric Porres, CMO of marketing technology company Lotame, discusses a study they carried out to measure online brand impact based on factors other than only click-through rates.  There were some insightful and quite surprising conclusions but as far as we are concerned, it underlines an important point that we keep making: CTR is only one part of the value chain. 
 
 

The Click-Through That May Be Hurting Your Brand - What If the Click Isn't Just Irrelevant, but Also a Negative Indicator for Success?
We all know the way our industry seized on click-through rates because it's so easy to measure. And we've long heard the arguments that a high CTR doesn't matter. What if that's not quite right, though? What if a high CTR matters -- but inversely? What if a high CTR is actually a negative indicator for your brand? 
Quite often, it is, according to a recent study conducted by Lotame. Not only do click-through rates fail to measure what marketers are really looking for, they're often negatively related to brand lift. 
 
 
In the study that Eric describes above, Lotame found that although there is a strong positive correlation between click-through rates and both interaction rates and brand favorability, there was far less of a positive correlation between CTR and purchase intent. What was more, there was a negative correlation between CTR and important brand metrics such as ad recall. Eric Porres concludes that by focusing a campaign solely on CTR there is a high possibility that there will be a negative impact on valuable brand measures. Campaigns should not only be concerned with driving clicks – there are other things that need to be taken into account.

Our CEO, Peles, also had some thoughts on the Lotame study, and while he was in complete agreement with the conclusions reached, he felt that campaigns considerations had to be taken even further:  “Whatever the desired results of a campaign,” he said, “CTR is only one part of the value chain. When running a campaign one must look at every step of the process from the first spark of a creative idea to the final analysis of conversion data."

Peles then added that the smart advertiser / marketer needs to look not only at the impact on the metrics considered by Lotame, but, and most importantly, they need to be concerned with the results they are getting from the campaign compared with what they are putting in. In other words, they need to ask, “Are the results a good return on investment?”  To be sure that their answer to this question is a positive one, they need to be sure that every link in the value chain is being optimized. This ultimately is the chief concern of DMG and is realized so comprehensively by the optimization platform Traffiliate.  

How do Affiliate & Results-based marketing coexist

by DMG Team May 21 , 2009 03:02

 As Affilicon Israel draws near, we approached Peles to discuss the interaction between the two marketing channels - Results-based online advertising & Affiliate marketing:

§         Q: How do affiliate marketing and results- based marketing co exist with the more traditional ways?
Peles:  Affiliate marketing is one segment within the broader scope of result based advertising. They in many cases compete for budget, although, in our opinion they shouldn't. More traditional ways should deal with what is called branding, and result base should deal with direct acquisitions. More sophisticated advertisers, transforming both their budgets to results - they just define the goals differently, but measure both and optimize both budgets.

§         Q: What is more effective affiliate or SEM?
Peles:
It is like asking what is more important, eating or drinking, for successful online advertising programs both should be effective, it is a matter of volume, competition and market.

Q: How does the economic situation affect affiliate and result based marketing? 
Peles: With the idea in mind that the world will continue to exist, people will continue to consume, result based advertising will gain ,market share over more traditional media spends. Budgets have started to shift towards places where Invested Euros are marked with their related income. In other words, acquisition and direct response campaigns are the last to be cut as they are considered to be revenue generating campaigns.



 

Keeping advertisers fueled for success

by DMG Team May 4 , 2009 07:02

Keeping the direct response advertiser fueled for success
by Rachael Alter, Director of Publisher Development

 

A direct response advertising campaign is fueled by many variables that can make it or break it. Some variables are primarily in the control of the
advertiser such as:
  • Website marketability
  • Offer
  • post click conversion

 On the side of the Service provider or, in our case, the "network" - we complete the picture with our expertise in providing the playing field and the optimization tactics. As a representative of the media side of the business, my responsibility is with the playing field or accurately; the rich Blend of traffic that provides the opportunity for the conversions to happen. This is fundamentally made up by a 2 level media pool: 
1. The base – the mass amounts of various traffic that provide multiple types of traffic from channels and placements that have some  slight relevance to the advertising offer.
 2.  Highly targeted, highly convertible traffic.
 Together these traffics create a blend that provides the advertiser with enough momentum to take its first baby steps in making the beginning conversions happen.

Once those occur it has to be provided with enough fuel to be able to learn and grow and be optimized using our technology, expertise and tactics into a significant volume campaign. One may ask why a campaign isn’t run on the second level traffic only where the highest likeliness of a conversion would occur.

The answer lies partially in the fact that this traffic is limited in its quantity and furthermore we have seen that to grow an advertiser to limitless expansion it is important to provide it with both types giving it the necessary bulk it needs to be a strong long lasting campaign. 

If the issue of the perfect blend of traffic isn’t enough; in order to keep going a long lasting successful campaign the traffic pool must remain forever fed by a continuous flux of new traffic in both of the levels. This compliments the continuous changes and optimization tactics made on the back end side of the campaign that creates each moment with a rich starting point for the new seed conversions. 

 

Essential Elements of Testing Online Campaigns

by Admin April 23 , 2009 02:44

By Gal Avidor, Account Manager

In this post we will demonstrate how a properly planned and funded test campaign can ultimately produce the desired results: lower eCPA, better reach of leads and new clients, and of course the major bottom line - higher ROI. 

For the past two years we have witnessed the emergence of many ventures looking to utilize results-based online advertising to drive potential customers to their website, and convert relevant traffic into sales dollars.   
 

Today, it is especially important for advertisers to maximize the utility of every dollar spent while casting a wide net in the vast online marketplace. Many advertisers have already invested a great deal of time and money developing a “designer” site platform and home page for incoming traffic, and are looking to test out the effectiveness of their designs before devoting a great deal of money to an advertising campaign.   In many cases, the size of the initial investment in the site creates a sense of urgency to quickly launch a test advertising campaign, with the hope that maximum performance can be achieved instantly on a small test budget. Our vast experience in this field has revealed that many advertisers make some common mistakes while developing online marketing plans for their websites, leading to a loss in efficiency and effectiveness, and costing more money in the long run to reach their goals. Here you will learn some of the essential elements of effectively testing an advertising campaign to maximize value over its lifetime. 

 A. Planning and Setting Objectives Set campaign objectives and define the value of your customer acquisition chain. Sample Objective: To achieve online sales while maintaining a daily sum of leads to support your calling center.  For this example, we get a mix of 3 options for a conversion process:  

  1. Short qualifying process (for online sales).
  2. Llong qualifying process (for enhanced lead quality).
  3. Mix of short and long processes.

 Defining a clear objective and putting a true price tag on the value of each component within the acquisition chain enables you to measure and evaluate how performance at the beginning of the process affects the value of other components within the value chain.  You can follow the chain to the final conversion and beyond, even analyzing each component’s affect on up-sell opportunities.  This critical level of analysis will ultimately increase your ROI. 

B. The Optimal Landing Page Mix
In order to ensure achievement of your objectives, you will need at least 2-3 optimized landing pages which are properly designed and structured, giving the right incentives for viewers to click through your acquisition chain. 
Sample Objective: One of our clients was seeking to achieve an eCPA (effective cost per acquisition) of $250 from online sales of a financial product with 3 landing pages: 

  1. Home page (not recommended)
  2. A “call for action” page
  3. Special incentive page

Testing these three, distinct landing pages gives us the ability to better understand the end user interaction and behavior in regards to our sales efforts. We can find out: Is the end user impulsive or is he more incentive driven?  Is he committed to enduring the whole conversion process or is he more comfortable with a short lead process, paving the way for an up-sell at a later date?   To summarize, the optimal landing page mix is an extremely important piece of information to maximize the reach of our conversion process, while enhancing our understanding of client behavior, and ultimately maximizing ROI. 

Landing Page Types – Pros and Cons: 

Landing page type

No. of leads No. of 1st time depositors first deposit basket value Reach  Lifetime value
Home Page Medium Low High Low High
Call for Action Medium\High Medium Medium Medium Medium
Special Incentive High Medium\High Low High Low

   C. Choosing a Test Budget:
Advertisers often commit a great deal of resources to building an online platform, but allocate minimal budgets to the testing phase, underestimating the capital needed to achieve a truly successful test that will translate to maximum ROI. The growing diversity of online traffic sources embodies many opportunities for advertisers to tap into new market opportunities, but it poses a great challenge of distinguishing between highly relevant, revenue-generating traffic sources and less relevant sources.  In order to calculate the ideal budget, one must take into account the different variables being tested during the campaign, these variables may include the CPA target goal, the number of creatives and Landing pages being tested and the number of traffic sources sampled during the learning process.It is important to point out that these variables differ from one advertiser to another, both in type and significance and depend much on the type of product or service being tested and the advertiser’s main and secondary objectives.These variables will dictate the size of the “Optimum budget” which is defined as the ideal budget to achieve a statistically viable conclusion to maximize ROI. To demonstrate how an Optimum budget can work for you, let's examine a real case study. 

D. Case Study 
Going back to our financial products example, where the advertiser was looking to achieve an eCPA of $250, he had created 3 landing pages and two creative sets totaling 10 creatives: CPA goal = $250Creatives tested = 10Landing pages tested = 3 Recommended test budget for the combination of number of variables and CPA goal is: $15,000With the test budget calculated the test campaign looks as follows: 

Phase 1: Preliminary AB testing The 3 landing pages were exposed to the same amount and mix of traffic in order to establish a general idea of potential for yield. This was done in order to plan the general distribution of traffic to be implemented during the actual testing phase. 

 Phase 2: Learning Phase (campaign) The test campaign was conducted for 4 weeks, constantly monitored and optimized. The results were as fallows: 

Test Campaign:

 
CPA Goal $250
No. of Creatives 10
No. of Landing pages 3
Budget: $15,000

Results:

             
Duration Budget Spent Leads New clients % of Converted leads  Average value of new client basket Total Revenue eCPA
 Week 1 $1,000         345              2 0.58% $179 $358 $500.00
 Week 2 $3,000         502              7 1.39% $145 $1,015 $428.57
 Week 3 $4,500         790            13 1.65% $129 $1,677 $346.15
 Week 4 $6,500      1,004            19 1.89% $111 $2,109 $342.11
 Totals $15,000      2,641            41 1.55% $141 $5,159.00 $365.85

 From the test results we can conclude that although the test did not yield the desired eCPA of $250, and did not produce a high ROI, it did exhibit a number of positive key elements, allowing us to make meaningful changes before launching a full campaign. 

  1. A positive trend in the number of new leads and new clients
  2. A positive trend in leads\new client's ratio.
  3. A decline in eCPA.
  4. A relatively large number of leads fit for potential up-selling.

  These elements play a key role as you will see in the phase 3 – the optimized campaign:

 Phase 3: Optimized Campaign After the learning was complete, the number of high performing landing pages was narrowed down to 2 and the number of creatives was narrowed to the 5 highest performers. With the proper test exercised, and traffic sources carefully analyzed, the optimized campaign was launched with a 75K budget, with the following results: 

Optimized Campaign:

CPA Goal $250
No. of Creatives 5
No. of Landing pages 2
Budget: $75,000
 

Duration

Budget Spent Leads New clients % of Converted leads  Average value of new client basket Total Revenue eCPA
1 Month          $75,000   29,043              655 2.26% $136      $89,080   $114.50

  

From this data, we can conclude the following: 

  1. The number of leads and new clients increased dramatically.
  2. So did the leads\new client's ratio.
  3. The average basket value for new client decreased but in exchange for higher reach and higher volume.
  4. The eCPA dropped drastically and registered below the client's initial goal.
  5. The total revenue generated by new clients, when added to the revenue from the test campaign, yielded a higher ROI.

 When summarizing both the testing phase and the optimized phase, the full picture becomes clear: 

Totals:

           
Total Budget Total Leads Total New clients % of Converted leads  Average value of new client basket Total Revenue eCPA
          $90,000             31,684         696 2.20% $135.4 $94,239 $129.31

 To summarize, defining and carefully planning the different aspects of a results-based online advertising campaign are crucial to achieving maximum results in the long run.

 

The New New Thing - TheMarker COMVENTION 2009

by Admin April 5 , 2009 04:16

Exhibiting at the Internet Convention in Israel last week, was a good opportunity to interact with the Israeli industry
and to introduce them with our comprehensive results-based approach to online advertising.
A closer look into our philosophy was provided by Peles in his workshop about pursuing results effectively and  some more on the central panel.
With the attendance of our DMG team at the event, results were clearly in sight.

Peles at the Panel: The Internet in Israel

 

At the booth: Inbar, Peles, Noam

 

Peles, DSNR and Shmil

 

At the booth No. 2: Inbar, Peles, Tom

Turning information into knowledge

by DMG Team March 25 , 2009 12:02

By Gilad Hellerman - CTO   

One of the major characteristics of the online-result-based-advertising industry is the huge numbers involved (no, I am not talking about the money, even though that is quite impressive as well, I am talking about impressions, clicks and conversions).  

 These numbers require special attention both in terms of technology (which I will address in my next post), and in terms of information gathering and analysis, which I will address in this post.What is our goal in all of this information gathering and analysis?Our ultimate goal is decision making, mainly towards campaign optimization, even though there are other decisions we need to make in order to maximize our profits. 

 In order to empower the user to make better decisions, we need to provide the user with knowledge on which the user can make his decisions. The emphasis is on knowledge as opposed to information since knowledge is actually the result of the procedure of processing the information we are presented with, during its storage in our brain. We make our decisions based on the knowledge rather then based on the information. Our goal therefore should be to process the information for our user so that it will save him some of the processing he will need to do by himself, and add bits of processing he might not have thought about, thus enlarging his knowledge.

 How do we turn information into knowledge?
We do that in four major stages:
1.       Data gathering
2.       Data analysis
3.       Deciding what, of the vast number of analyzed data to present.
4.       Presenting the data in a way that will make it easiest to use and consume by the user. 
 

Establishing the decisions on knowledge rather then information is the only way to effectively manage this vast amount of data in the online advertising world.

Gilad

 

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.4.5.0
Theme by Mads Kristensen